【電子書籍なら、スマホ・パソコンの無料アプリで今すぐ読める！】
1,690 円 （税抜き）
...
According to Deh? (2002), 'the perhaps most striking property of transitive PV's in English is their appearance in two alternating orders' (3) as the English particle 'can appear on either side of a direct object, unless it is a (non-contrastively accented) pronoun' (Deh? et al. 2002:2, cf. Jackendoff ibid.). In the so-called continuous order the particle is 'adjacent to the verb and precedes the DP-complement' as in (1) (Deh? 2002:3-4). In the discontinuous order 'the particle follows the DP-object' (cf. 2) (ibid.). In this order the use of unstressed pronouns is obligatory as illustrated in (3) (ibid.; the following examples are borrowed from Deh?:ibid. as well). (1) He wiped off the table. (2) He wiped the table off. (3) a. He wiped it off. b. *He wiped off it. Concerning the syntactic structure of English VPCs, several questions might be asked: 1. How does the syntactic structure of VPCs in English look like? 2. How do the alternating word orders come about? 3. Which of the word orders is the underlying one? Linguists have developed many different approaches to the syntactic structure of VPCs. This paper is going to focus attention on three different syntactic analyses for English VPCs and attempts to answer the questions posed above. Before presenting the different approaches, some basic characteristics of English VPCs will be introduced. Afterwards, the approaches, namely the Small Clause analysis according to Kayne (1985) and two different complex head analyses by Johnson (1991) and Deh? (2002), will be elucidated and discussed.画面が切り替わりますので、しばらくお待ち下さい。※ご購入は、楽天kobo商品ページからお願いします。
※切り替わらない場合は、こちら をクリックして下さい。
※このページからは注文できません。